Introduction
In its more than 70-year history, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has gone from a secondary lender to an organization that determines the economic policy of most developing countries and countries with economies in transition.
The history of the creation of the IMF
The upheavals of the early 20th century – the First World War, the Great Depression, and then the Second World War - largely predetermined the structure and functions of the IMF.
Already after the First World War, the question arose about the need for multilateral interstate regulation of international economic relations. To this end, the Brussels (1921) and Genoa (1922) Conferences on economic problems were convened, at which the need to create a special body that would promote economic cooperation between the countries was recognized. However, both conferences did not produce the expected results.
During the 1930s, several international conferences were held to address the issue of world currencies and international economic relations, but they were not crowned with success. The Great Depression dealt a crushing blow to the world economy – between 1929 and 1932, the prices of goods worldwide fell by 48%, and the volume of world trade decreased by 63%. However, the positive result of the Great Depression was the understanding of the inextricable link between political security and economic prosperity, as well as the fact that with the expansion of foreign economic relations under the influence of external factors, the vulnerability of national economies increases. It became obvious that there are no winners in the policy of isolationism, trade and currency wars and there will be no winners.
The crisis of international monetary and credit relations escalated with renewed vigor during World War II, when most countries, with the exception of the United States, Switzerland, Mexico and Central American countries, imposed currency restrictions. World economic ties were disrupted, Europe was almost completely under occupation, France fell, the British Empire was desperately fighting for existence, the USSR was fighting near Moscow. Under these conditions, the role of a leader in the development of a new world order was assumed by a country that at that time had a fast-growing economy and the strongest armed forces - the United States.
Regarding what kind of world order should be built after the end of the war, there was a confident consensus in American society: preventing the repetition of the British experience of creating empires based on power control over weak societies; respect for the principle of national self-determination; creating a system of collective security; world economic cooperation based on equal access to trade and investment, universalism and multilateralism. Elimination of all discriminatory barriers, replacement of bilateral economic relations with multilateral ones, which would allow all countries, according to American strategists, to benefit from global economic competition, equal access to raw materials, economic specialization based on the principle of "comparative advantages".
In such an open multilateral world, where there are universal, uniform laws of interaction for all, where there is interdependence, the likelihood of a new world conflict will be significantly reduced, because, in the words of US Deputy Treasury Secretary G. White, "the best neighbors are prosperous neighbors."
Read more: What are CBDC and why do central banks need them
During the Second World War, a huge number of committees were created in the United States, whose task was to develop a new world order. All these committees offered various options for the post-war world order, but they all agreed on the need to create specialized regulatory institutions.
These institutions were supposed to preserve and, in the event of a weakening of the United States, reproduce order in various spheres of world politics and economy, i.e., "international regimes".
It was planned to create a monetary and financial regime, trade, energy, maritime, military security regime, etc., which were to be coordinated by the United Nations (UN). In addition to coordinating functions, the UN was supposed to play the role of a unified system of world security.
Various committees and commissions in the UK and other countries of the anti-Hitler coalition were also engaged in the development of the most important international economic regimes. Among the proposed projects for the creation of an international monetary and financial organization and a new system of international monetary relations, the central place was occupied by the plan of the international stabilization fund, developed by G. White (USA) and the plan of the international clearing union - D.M. Keynes (Great Britain).
D.M. Keynes' plan largely reflected the interests of Great Britain and was designed to ease its monetary and financial situation. It was proposed to create an international clearing union that would perform the functions of the world central bank. In particular, he had to issue a non-cash international means of payment not backed by gold, which was planned to be used for settlements between states to pay off balance of payments deficits. Thus, the international clearing union was supposed to act as an institution for settlements between countries, in which the latter would have accounts in banks.
According to the Keynes plan, an overdraft was supposed to be allowed for these accounts, which would ensure, within certain limits, automatic mutual lending of countries - covering the liabilities of the balance of payments of some countries at the expense of others, primarily at the expense of the United States.
G. White's plan aimed to create a post-war monetary system based on the "international currency", and the primary goal was to stabilize the exchange rates of the allied countries to encourage productive capital flows. White emphasized that maintaining stable exchange rates means eliminating currency risk in international economic and financial transactions. In this regard, the costs of foreign trade are reduced, and capital enters the country where it receives the greatest profit in the absence of the risk of currency depreciation.
Initially, the plan provided for the creation of a stabilization fund in the amount of $5 billion, consisting of gold and government securities of the participating countries to issue short-term loans to finance balance of payments deficits. At the same time, the stabilization fund had the right to unilaterally change the exchange rate of the borrower country, force the country to cancel currency control. Such powers of the stabilization fund too clearly affected the economic sovereignty of the member countries and in this form were unacceptable. Therefore, the first version of the plan has undergone significant revision.
Read more: Causes of inflation and scientific approaches to their study
The final version of White 's plan was published in 1943 . It was discussed by experts from 30 countries. The plan pursued several goals: to assist in stabilizing exchange rates, reducing periods and reducing the degree of imbalance in the balance of payments, promoting the creation of conditions for strengthening foreign trade and production, facilitating the effective use of blocked foreign exchange funds, easing currency restrictions and other discriminatory measures.
Despite the fact that the main long-term goal of the White plan was to create a universal world of "open doors", "international capitalism" with the dominance of multilateral economic and political relations, in the medium term it allowed for the predominance of a more closed form of capitalism, or "national capitalism", which was supposed to allow countries to prevent the aggravation of the economic crisis by achieving full employment, even at the cost of reducing economic efficiency.
To achieve these goals, it was envisaged that the Fund would have resources of at least $5 billion. Member countries pay their quota, which is calculated based on their economic situation (foreign exchange reserves, balance of payments, national income, etc.), 30% in gold, and the rest in national currency and government securities (no more than 50% of the quota). It was also envisaged that the value of national currencies would be set through the currency unit of the Unitas Fund, the value of which was equal to $10. The United States according to the gold content of that time, and the country's gold operations could only be carried out at parity. A change in the parity of the country's currencies was allowed only in cases of fundamental imbalance of the country's balance of payments and with the consent of 3/4 of the Fund's member countries.
The plans of D.M. Keynes and G.D. White were discussed at an international conference in Bretton Woods (USA, New Hampshire), held on July 1-29, 1944. The British delegation was headed by D.M. Keynes himself, and although the White plan was taken as the basis for creating a new world order, some adjustments were made to it. The conference resulted in a compromise decision on the establishment of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help countries fight foreign trade deficits and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) to provide loans for post-war reconstruction. This decision was the first important step towards the creation of a new world order. The 44 countries that participated in the conference and signed the agreements had to ensure currency convertibility with the help of the IMF and the IBRD, maintain a stable exchange rate (+ 10%), remove major trade restrictions and balance their foreign trade deficit. At the request of London, all these measures were allowed to be postponed for five years after the end of the war.
Thanks to the principle of decision-making based on a "weighted number" of votes prescribed in the charter, which linked the number of votes of a country in an organization with its entry fee and contribution to the world economy, the United States claimed 30% of all votes in the IMF and IBRD, which automatically made them the main manager of the resources of these organizations.
Read more: What is Deflation: signs, causes and consequences
IMF objectives
The objectives of the IMF are:
- Promotion of international cooperation in the monetary sphere.
- Promoting the expansion and balanced growth of international trade and, consequently, employment growth and improvement of the economic conditions of the member countries.
- Ensuring the functioning of the international monetary system by coordinating and coordinating monetary policy and maintaining exchange rates and currency reversibility of member countries; ensuring orderly relations in the monetary sphere between member countries.
- Determination of parities and exchange rates; prevention of currency depreciation in order to gain competitive advantages.
- Assistance in the creation of a multilateral system of payments for current transactions between member countries and in the elimination of currency restrictions.
- Providing assistance to member countries by providing loans and credits in foreign currency to settle balance of payments and stabilize exchange rates.
- Reducing the duration and reducing the degree of imbalance in the international balance of payments of the member countries.
- Provision of advisory assistance on financial and monetary issues to member countries.
- Monitoring compliance by member countries with the Code of Conduct in International Monetary Relations.
According to an informal agreement reached during the creation of the Bretton Woods institutions, the President of the IBRD should be an American, and the Managing Director of the IMF should be a European. According to tradition, the candidacy of the president of the IBRD is determined by the executive director from the USA. Therefore, all the presidents of the Bank were US citizens, although formally the nationality of the president is not recorded in the constituent documents.
As the world monetary system evolved, as well as in the process of transforming the IMF's activities, the articles of Agreement were revised three times: in 1968-1969 in connection with the formation of the Special Drawing Rights mechanism (SDR); in the second amendment, made in 1976-1978, the basic principles of the new, Jamaican international monetary System, which replaced the Bretton Woods monetary system, were defined; The Third Amendment (1990-1992) provided for the imposition of sanctions in the form of suspension of the right to vote in respect of member countries that have not fulfilled their financial obligations to the Fund.
Read more: IPO of a company - mechanism, examples & strategies
Structure of management bodies
1. The highest governing body of the IMF is the Board of Governors, in which each member country is represented by a governor and his deputy. These are usually finance ministers or central bankers. The Board is responsible for resolving key issues of the Fund's activities, for example, amendments to the Articles of Agreement, admission and exclusion of member countries, determination and revision of their shares in the capital, election of executive directors. The managers usually meet once a year, but they can hold their meetings, as well as vote by mail at any time.
The IMF operates on the principle of a "weighted" number of votes, which assumes that the ability of member countries to influence the Fund's activities through voting is determined by their share in the IMF's capital.
Each Member State has 250 "basic" votes, regardless of the amount of its contribution to the capital, and additionally one vote for every 100 thousand SDR. However, this does not mean that a country can buy as many votes in the Fund as it needs to increase its influence on decisions made in the organization. A country can buy additional votes only within its quota, which is calculated based on the country's contribution to the world economy.
This procedure ensures a decisive majority of votes for the largest States. The following countries have the largest number of votes in the IMF: the USA - 16.51%; Japan - 6.15%; China - 6.08%; Germany - 5.32%; Great Britain - 4.03%; France - 4.03%; Russia - 2.59%; Saudi Arabia - 2.01% The share of the 27 EU member states is 25.55%..
Decisions in the Governing Council are usually taken by a simple majority (at least half) of votes, and on the most important issues of an operational or strategic nature – by a "special majority" (respectively 70% or 85% of the votes of the member countries). The Charter highlights 53 such issues (against 9 when the IMF was created).
The US and the EU have the right to veto key decisions of the Fund, the adoption of which requires a maximum majority of votes (85%). This causes discontent and concern in developing countries and countries with economies in transition.
2. According to the Charter, the Governing Council may establish a new permanent governing body – the Council at the ministerial level of the member countries to oversee the regulation and adaptation of the world monetary system.
Its role was played by the established in 1974 . The Interim Committee of the Board of Governors on the International Monetary System is an Interim Committee (Interim Committee of tile Board of Governors on the International Monetary System), which in 1999 was transformed into the International Monetary and Financial Committee, which performs important functions for the management of the Executive Board; developing strategic decisions related to the functioning of the international monetary system and the activities of the IMF; submitting proposals to the Board of Governors on amendments to the Articles of the IMF Agreement.
The Joint Ministerial Committee of the Governing Councils of the IBRD and the IMF on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries, the Development Committee, also has a similar status. He advises the Boards of Governors of the IMF and the IBRD, holds joint meetings with the Monetary and Financial Committee to prepare reports and consultations on all aspects of the transfer of real resources.
3. The Governing Council has delegated a significant part of its powers to the Executive Board, i.e. the Directorate, which is responsible for managing the affairs of the IMF, including a wide range of political, operational and administrative issues, in particular, providing loans to member countries and overseeing their exchange rate policies. The Executive Board works on a permanent basis at the Foundation's headquarters in Washington and usually meets three times a week.
Since 1992, the number of executive directors has been increased to 24, in 1946 there were 12. Five of them are appointed, according to the Charter, the United States, Germany, Japan, Britain and France, i.e. the five countries with the largest quotas in the capital of the IMF; the three – formally elected, but each represent one country – Saudi Arabia, Russia and China; sixteen are elected from the rest of the member States, divided into an appropriate number of groups that formed the basis of geographical representation either on the basis of common interests. Appointments and elections of executive directors are held once every two years. The Director has the number of votes that are used collectively by the managers who elected him. However, in most cases, decisions in the Executive Board are made not by formal voting, but by prior consensus of its members. The IMF Executive Board elects a Managing Director for a 5-year term, who heads the staff of the Fund and is in charge of current affairs; he acts as Chairman of the Executive Board.
Read more: LIBOR: what does it mean and how is it calculated?
Capital
Equity capital
The IMF is organized on the model of a joint-stock company. This means that its capital consists of contributions from Member States made by subscription. Each country has a quota expressed in SDR. The quota is a key link in the relationship of a member country with the Fund. It defines:
- the amount of the subscription to the IMF capital;
- the possibilities of using the Fund's resources;
- the amount of SDR received by the member country at their next distribution;
- the number of votes that the country has in the Fund, as discussed above.
Initially, quotas were to be set according to a rather complicated arithmetic formula: the sum of 2% of national income in 1940, 5% of gold and foreign exchange reserves as of July 1943, 10% of the average value of imports in 1934-1938 and 10% of the maximum value of exports multiplied by the average percentage of exports to national income for 1934-1938. In practice, this formula proved to be inapplicable, as many countries were unable to provide the necessary data. Therefore, the components of the formula have been repeatedly changed.
To date, the size of the quota is calculated on the basis of data on the country's economy. For countries joining the Fund, the quota size is compared with the quotas of countries with similar economic parameters. The size of the quota is considered by the Directorate, which transmits the resolution on adoption to the Board of Governors. After the resolution is approved by the Board of Governors, the country signs the founding agreement and becomes a member of the Fund.
In accordance with the Bretton Woods Agreement, the participating country had to contribute to the authorized capital of the Fund 25% of the quota in gold or US dollars, or 10% of its official gold and foreign exchange reserves, and the rest in its own monetary units.
The Jamaican Agreement exempted countries from the need for a contribution in gold. Now the former "golden share" of the subscription to the IMF's capital is paid by the member country in reserve assets, which are "special drawing rights" and freely convertible currencies of other member countries chosen by the Fund subject to the consent of these countries. In principle, such a share may be less than 25%.
Read more: What is Quantitative Easing (QE) and its impact on financial markets
The exact ratio between countries' contributions to the IMF's capital in reserve assets and national currencies is determined by the Board of Governors. However, as follows from the Charter, it does not have the right to set the amount of payment in reserve assets in an amount exceeding 25% of the quota of the participating country. This practice is also used when increasing the size of quotas. Part of the contribution in national currency, which is not needed by the IMF for current operations, is made by the member country in the form of non-revolving interest-free obligations, paid at the request of the Fund based on their nominal value. All funds in national currencies transferred to the Fund as a subscription to the IMF's capital are held in the central banks of the respective member countries.
According to the IMF Charter, quotas are reviewed at least once every five years. As a result of the increase in quotas and the increase in the number of member countries, the IMF's capital increased from 7.7 billion in 1947 to 212 billion SDR ($297 billion) after the last revision of quotas in 1999.
The change in the size of quotas determines the degree of a country's influence on the IMF's activities, therefore, the general revision of quotas for leading countries was accompanied by a change in their place in the hierarchy of IMF member countries.
Thus, as a result of the quota revision, there was a noticeable redistribution of forces among the five leading member countries with the largest quotas. With each revision, the positions of Japan and Germany are strengthening, which as a result came in second and third places, while Great Britain and France moved to fourth from second and third respectively.
However, in general, the increase in IMF resources significantly lags behind the growth of total global GDP and, to an even greater extent, the dynamics of the volume of international payments on current transactions. To date, the issue of reviewing quotas and, accordingly, the number of votes that the country has when voting in the Fund is one of the most pressing on the agenda of reforming the IMF's activities in accordance with the changed balance of power in the global economy.
Despite the fact that the IMF's capital has an impressive size, in reality, not all capital is used to provide loans to member countries, but only a relatively limited range of currencies included by the Fund's management in the quarterly operating budget.
These are the currencies of the Member States whose balance of payments and international reserves are recognized by the Fund as sufficiently strong. The list of currencies used for credit transactions is constantly being reviewed as the situation in the issuing countries of these currencies changes. The operating budget resources are based on funds in currencies that the IMF considers to be among the so-called "freely used currencies" (currently - the US dollar, Japanese yen, euro, British pound sterling). Therefore, the IMF uses borrowed funds to replenish its resources.
Read more: What is macroeconomic statistics? Macrostatistics aggregators and their examples
Borrowed funds
In addition to its own capital, the IMF has the ability to attract borrowed funds. The countries belonging to the "Group of Ten" or their central banks (Belgium, Great Britain, Italy, Canada, the German Federal Bank, the Netherlands, the USA, France, the Swedish State Bank, Japan) concluded General Arrangements to Borrow (GAB), which entered into force on October 24, 1962. In 1964, the Swiss National Bank joined them as an associate member (since April 1984, participates in full).
The GAB provided for the opening by the participating countries or their central banks of credit lines to the Fund on a permanently renewable basis in the amount of up to 6.5 billion SDR ($8.8 billion). The Fund uses these funds only in cases where it is necessary to "prevent or eliminate the disruption of the international monetary system." That is, loans received by countries through the GAB should not serve as a regular source to cover long-term balance of payments deficits caused by trade deficits, government spending abroad and other current account payments.
The GAB was initially concluded for four years, and then began to be renewed every five years. During their next revision in December 1983, the participants of the GAB agreed to increase the loan limits to SDR 17 billion (about $24 billion). These agreements are also linked to the agreement reached in 1983 with Saudi Arabia on a credit line on similar terms in the amount of 1.5 billion SDR ($2.1 billion).
In July 1998, the participating countries of the GAB agreed to provide the Fund with a loan under this mechanism in the amount of 6.3 billion SDR (about $8.3 billion) to provide financial assistance to Russia. This is the first use of GAB funds in the last 20 years and the first time such funds have been received by a country that is not a member of the GAB . In 1978, the Fund used the funds of the GAB to finance the withdrawal of the reserve share of the United States. In total, the resources of the GAB were used 10 times.
The need to increase credit operations prompted the IMF in the 1980s to turn to sources of borrowed funds, attracted not only within the framework of a multilateral mechanism, but also on a bilateral basis, in order to strengthen its financial base. The Fund received loans from the treasuries or central banks of Australia, Belgium, Great Britain, Ireland, Finland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and Japan, as well as from the Bank for International Settlements (Basel). The IMF has not yet resorted to borrowing from private banks, although the Charter provides it with such an opportunity.
In the mid-1990s, due to the sharply increased need for resources to counteract the further spread of the Mexican financial crisis, which by that time had engulfed Argentina and Brazil, a group of industrialized countries (the "Group of Seven") proposed in June 1995 to implement measures that would double the credit potential within the GAB. As a result of the negotiations and discussions that followed, the IMF Executive Board on January 27, 1997 approved New loan Agreements, New Arrangements to Borrow, to which 25 states (or central banks) have already become participants. In addition to the countries and participants of the GAB, the GAB includes: Australia, Austria, the Hong Kong Monetary Agency, Denmark, Spain, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Singapore, the National Bank of Sweden (Riksbank), Thailand, Finland, South Korea. Such a large number of GAB participants reflected the changing nature of the global economy.
On November 17, 1998, the new loan agreements entered into force. In accordance with these agreements, the Fund can receive funds from participating States in the amount of up to SDR 34 billion (about $47 billion) in the event "when it is necessary to prevent or combat violations of the global monetary system or to resolve an exceptional situation that threatens the stability of the system."
The new agreements are not a replacement for the GAB. However, the maximum amount of funds available to the Fund under both mechanisms should not exceed a total of SDR 34 billion. If there is a need to provide the IMF with additional resources, the GAB is called upon to act as the main source of such resources. The GAB is renewed every five years.
The funds of this credit line can be used by both GAB participants and other IMF member countries. The GAB provides for the possibility of other countries joining this mechanism, this requires the consent of the IMF and its participants. GAB participants annually hold meetings during the session of the IMF Board of Governors to discuss the functioning of the mechanism, macroeconomic development, the state of money markets, etc., affecting the stability of the global financial system.
Read more: OPEC: history, goals and functions